QTPC for 10/08/2009

Quotation:

            “ ‘I have strong feelings about getting past the basics. Too many schools are stripping down curriculum to meet the pressure for success on tests that measure only minimal skills. That’s why I teach a theater course…I have a student, Carlos, who dropped out once and then returned. He had no confidence in his ability. Then he began to act. He memorized the part of Pyramus. Then he played Sebastian in The Tempest…Now, if we didn’t have that theater program, you have got to ask if Carlos would have stayed in school.’”[1]

 

Talking Point:

It’s unfortunate how many schools encourage teachers nowadays teach only for the test. If they put effort into creativity in their teaching styles, don’t the students actually learn more as in the example above?

 

Connection:

The conditions of the schools described in Savage Inequalities reminded me of an old TV series titled “Christy.” In this series, a missionary named Christy travels to an exceedingly impoverished community for the purpose of educating the children in a school setting. This school, like many mentioned in the book, hardly has any supplies and tools needed for an effective learning environment, yet because of the creativity and heart of Christy , she is able to teach the children well.

 


[1] Kozol, Jonathon; Savage Inequalities; pp. 101, 102

Published in: on October 8, 2009 at 10:18 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 10/06/2009

Quotation:

“I asked the students, ‘What would happen if the government decided that the students in a nearby town like Fairview Heights and the students here in East St. Louis had to go to school together next September?’

            Samantha: ‘The buses going to Fairview Heights would all be full. The buses coming to East St. Louis would be empty.’

            ‘What if East St. Louis had the very best computer classes in the state – and if there were no computer classes in the school of Fairview Heights?’

            ‘The buses coming here,’ she says, ‘would still be empty.’

            When I ask her why, she answers in these quiet words, ‘I don’t know why.’”[1]

 

Talking Point:

Even in the early 1990s, one’s race and color was still an issue in the United States. The excerpt above displays these tensions. If offered the choice of better classes, the East St. Louis students would quickly take advantage, whereas the Fairview Heights’ students would decline due to the racial tensions.

 

Connection: 

When the group of kids gather around and tell the author in detail of the shocking deaths of their relatives and friends, it reminded me of the setting in Orson Scott Card’s novel, Bean. In the beginning of this novel, the children growing up in the inner city are the same way: they are too familiar with and have been desensitized to death due to the constant struggle to stay alive amidst the poverty.

 


[1] Kozol, Jonathan; Savage Inequalities; pp. 13-14

Published in: on October 6, 2009 at 10:29 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 10/01/2009

Quotation:

“Toloki remembers that these arguments have come up in some of the funerals he has attended. Various Nurses, and other funeral orators, have blamed the tribal chief for all kinds of atrocities. He has concocted a non-existent threat to his people, telling them that they are at risk from other ethnic groups in the country. Whereas other leaders are trying very hard to build one free and united nation out of the various ethnic groups and races, he thinks he will reach a position of national importance by exploiting ethnicity, and by telling people of his ethnic group that if they don’t fight they will be overwhelmed by other groups which are bent an dominating them, or even exterminating them. Their very existence is at stake, he teaches them. ‘The rotten tribal chief is exploiting ethnicity in order to solidify his power base!’ funeral orators have eruditely explained.”[1]

Talking Point:

It’s interesting to note the change in tone from Coetzee’s Disgrace to Zakes’ Ways of Dying. In, the first, Coetzee writes from the perspective of a white, well-to-do professor who can easily take advantage of the lower-class, South African Black population. In Ways of Dying, the reader can feel the emotions of the Black population during their oppression from the upper-class, South African Whites.

Connection:

The quotation reminded me of the following section in the video clip “Poor Whites – South Africa:”

Interviewer: Do you understand how ironic it sounds for white South Africans to complain about a government being racially motivated considering the history here?

Kriel: Yeah, well, uh, but, from the outside, we also see it ironic that a government that fought against racial legislation is now doing exactly the same, what they fought against.

The ANC, formerly a group of freedom fighters, came to power promising to create a non-racial society. But there’s now clear discrimination on the basis of color.

Pahad: You cannot have transformation without pain; you cannot.

Interviewer: Isn’t black economic empowerment, though, in itself, a racist policy?

Pahad: What?

Interviewer: Well, because it’s about race. The entire policy is race-based, isn’t it?

Pahad: Why don’t you look at our constitution?

Interviewer: Well, the very phrase ‘black economic empowerment’ implies that it’s race-based. Are you saying it’s not?

Pahad: No! We had an Apartheid policy that was declared a crime against humanity. Now, either we reproduce Apartheid, or we move and we change, and we change to a non-racial society. But to move to a non-racial society you’ve got to empower those who for more than 350 years had been systematically disempowered, systematically oppressed, systematically repressed, and systematically deprived of every single possibility to grow. Now, how are you going to do that without taking a position?[2]


[1] Mda, Zakes; Ways of Dying; pg. 55

[2] Jorneymanpictures; YouTube; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFj0HdW2iDs

Published in: on October 1, 2009 at 7:35 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 09/29/2009

Quotation:

       “It is he who takes over the driving. Halfway home, Lucy, to his surprise, speaks. ‘It was so personal,’ she says. ‘It was done with such personal hatred. That was what stunned me more than anything. The rest was…expected. But why did they hate me so? I had never set eyes on them.’

       He waits for more, but there is no more, for the moment. ‘It was history speaking through them,’ he offers at last. ‘A history of wrong. Think of it that way, if it helps. It may have seemed personal, but it wasn’t. It came down from the ancestors.’”[1]

 

“‘Yes, the road I am following may be the wrong one. But if I leave the farm now I will leave defeated, and will taste that defeat for the rest of my life.’”[2]

 

Talking Point:

Concerning the second quote, Lucy has resorted to stay at the farm even if it means facing her aggressors a second time. She does not want to live with defeat, so she is willing to endure the pain and suffering.

 

Connection:

The reason Lucy felt that her assailants’ hated toward her despite being a total stranger was because of the Apartheid in South Africa. The attack on Lucy revealed the bottled up, racial hatred, and she felt it.

 


[1] Coetzee, J. M.; Disgrace; pg. 156

[2] Coetzee, J. M.; Disgrace; pg. 161

Published in: on September 29, 2009 at 8:44 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 09/24/2009

Quotation:

     “ ‘Nonsense!’ says Bill Shaw. ‘What else are friends for? You would have done the same.’

     …Bill Shaw believes that if he, Bill Shaw, had been hit over the head and set on fire, then he, David Lurie, would have driven to the hospital and sat waiting, without so much as a newspaper to read, to fetch him home. Bill Shaw believes that, because he and David Lurie once had a cup of tea together, David Luire is his friend, and the two of them have obligations towards each other…Does the drinking of tea seal a love-bond, in the eyes of Bill Shaw? Yet but for Bill and Bev Shaw,… where would he be now? On the ruined farm with the broken telephone amid the dead dogs.”[1]

 

Talking Point:

I didn’t expect Lucy to react the way she did after the incident. I was expecting her to express a little more emotion towards her father rather than acting so detached and cold.

 


[1] Coetzee, J. M.; Disgrace; pg. 102

Published in: on September 24, 2009 at 10:45 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 09/22/2009

Quotation:

“Do the young still fall in love, or is that mechanism obsolete by now, unnecessary, quaint, like steam locomotion? He is out of touch, out of date. Falling in love could have fallen out of fashion and come back again half a dozen times, for all he knows.”[1]

 

“…we cannot live our daily lives in a realm of pure ideas, cocooned from sense-experience. The question is not, How can we keep the imagination pure, protected from the onslaughts of reality? The question has to be, Can we find a way for the two to coexist?”[2]

 

Talking Point:

I think it’s sad how hard it is to recognize true love in a couple’s relationship. These days, so many are dating merely as a result of superficial, self-gratifying feelings and not out of their genuine, true love for the other member.

 

Connection:

When Coetzee talks about mixing imagination and sense-perception, it reminded me of Socrates example of the captives in the black cave. They could not see the outside so they imagined what it was like. When one finally escapes and is able to see what it is really like, the rest do not believe him because they are stuck in their imaginations.

 


[1] Coetzee, J. M.; Disgrace; pg. 13

[2] Coetzee, J. M.; Disgrace; pg. 22

Published in: on September 22, 2009 at 8:18 am  Leave a Comment  

Research Paper – Prospectus #2

Communitarianism is a philosophy seeking to establish a perfect society on earth, a utopia, by focusing on community cooperation rather than individual competition. This idea is similar to those expressed in Huxley’s novel, Brave New World. Communitarianism has been tested through many experimental communities across the United States, but the largest example might be the settlement of New Harmony founded in 1825. Despite the great ambitions for this colony, it only lasted four years, swiftly dissolving in 1829 due to disharmony amongst the inhabitants. Owing to the absence of individualism and lack of ownership of private property, early proponents soon became skeptics and promptly foresaw the imminent collapse of the community. Regardless, others still support the idea of a communitarian society even today. In my opinion, communitarianism has several flaws. Individuals control the community and not the opposite, so the idea of a large community-based system will not be successful in the long run. Even though the society would be designed to be focused on cooperation, I believe, given the inconsistent nature of humankind, there can never be a large communitarian society.

Published in: on September 19, 2009 at 3:24 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 09/17/2009

Quotation:

“What happened on you, Françoise? You went crazy, or what?! I had the whole time to watch out that this Shvartser doesn’t steal us the groceries from the back seat!”

            “What?! That’s outrageous! Now can you, of all people, be such a racist! You talk about Blacks the way the Nazis talked about the Jews!”

            “Ach!…I thought really you are more smart than this, Françoise…it’s not even to compare the Shvartsers and the Jews!”[1]

 

Talking Point:

It’s interesting to see Vladek’s hypocrisy in his opinion of the African-American hitchhiker. He is completely blind to the fact that he is repeating the wrongs shown him.

 

Connection:

Conveying the American as dogs really brought home the image of authentic liberation. The qualities associated with dogs, such as loyalty, courage, and confidence, helped to contrast the roles of the helpless prisoners, or the mice, with the strong liberating troops.

 


[1] Spiegelman, Art; Maus II; pg. 99

Published in: on September 17, 2009 at 7:59 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 09/15/2009

Quotation:

“His place is overrun with stray dogs and cats…Can I mention this, or does it completely louse up my metaphor?…Framed photo of pet cat. Really!”[1]

 

Talking Point:

I think it’s funny how Spiegelman plays around with his metaphors while many reprimand him for them. I think it’s good to have fun with your writing and not to exclusively keep everything serious all the time.

 

Connection:

The manner in which Spiegelman was able to gain and keep the respect of the guards reminded me of the TV show “Hogan’s Heroes.” Even though Hogan is a prisoner in a German camp, he always finds a way, whether through intelligence or humor, to win the confidence of the guards.

 


[1] Spiegelman, Art; Maus II; pg. 43

Published in: on September 15, 2009 at 6:41 am  Leave a Comment  

QTPC for 09/10/2009

Quotation:

  “ ‘No, Vladek! You’re crazy! It’s too dangerous!’

     ‘But if we hear from Abraham – ’

     ‘We’re safe here – forget about Hungary’

     ‘But what do we do if the Gestapo comes to search for illegal goods? …What if a neighbor notices us through the kitchen window? …’

     ‘I’m not going!’

     ‘What if her husband finds out about us? Even the boy could let something slip! …This war could last another 4 or 5 years. What do we do when our money runs out? In Hungary we could be free to walk the streets again, like human beings…I’ve always taken care of you – trust me.’

     ‘I’m so scared.’ ”[1]

 

Talking Point:

What would you do if you were given a wonderful opportunity to escape and be free once again? Would you stay and settle for what had been working despite the relentless pain and anxiety or would you risk it all for freedom?

 

Connection:

When Vladek is able to buy good, rare food for Anja, it reminded me of when my grandfather was hiding from the Germans. He had to get used to eating bad food like raw eggs. He was very grateful when he was able to eat food real again.

 


[1]Spiegelman, Art; Maus I; pg. 151

Published in: on September 10, 2009 at 6:50 am  Leave a Comment  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.